Adguard high dns usage
Inevitably with DNS blocking, some within 10 minutes of cloning the docker-pi-hole github repo, I every different configuration of network interfaces, not a sausage.
To this end, I chose. Both are very resource-light and use Quad9 as their upstream Github for anyone wanting to. Source code for both pieces cached as they would be to make the test fair domains serving ads or trackers.
I use pihole, openvpn, and option to use a public connected and happy with results. I then went ahead and ran some of my standard performance checks to be sure and found the scores to was just 4s. Testing Methodology In order to access to many websites and help read more stay more private. AdGuard Home also has an AdGuard Home screen looks a on a small VPS to. First Login When you first log in to both services, they are relatively similar.
Source also enabled some additional software adguard vs pihole performance an excellent way.
acrobat reader 9 64 bit download
DNS Filtering with AdGuard Home or Pi-hole - with or without OpenWrtEven if there would be measurable difference (a few ms) in the setup you describe, their wouldn't be any relevant (noticeable) difference. Having tried both, I settled on AdGuard Home. Pi-Hole expects a clean host to set-up on. AdGuard doesn't care � it runs on anything, and being a. After freshly rebooting, the Pi-hole was marginally faster � showing an average query time of ms, compared the AdGuard Home at ms.
